4.0 Article

Four decades of National Blood Service in Iran: outreach, prospect and challenges

Journal

TRANSFUSION MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 138-143

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tme.12214

Keywords

blood donor recruitment; blood transfusion; transfusion-transmitted infections

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the changes and progress made to Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) during 1974-2014 in order to identify the shortcomings. BackgroundThe History of Blood transfusion in Iran can be traced back to the 1940s. IBTO was established in 1974 as a national centralised organisation, supported by Iranian government for its budget and supplies and provides its products free of charge to both public and private hospitals. MethodsThe statistics have been derived from IBTO Statistical Center. Also related literature has been reviewed. ResultsFrom 1974 to 2014, donation per population has been increased about eight times. IBTO reached 100% voluntary blood donation in 2007, but the number of female blood donors in Iran is six times lower than average global rate. On one hand, the prevalence rate of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in blood donors was dropped in to one fifth and one third, respectively during past 8 years. On the other hand, irrational blood usage and lack of integrated blood stock management systems and non self-sufficiency on plasma-derivedmedicines are considered as main challenges of IBTO. ConclusionForty years since the establishment, IBTO managed to achieve considerable improvements in different fields but many challenges still remain, which need to be addressed urgently. Great gap between the number of male and female blood donors in Iran has to be filled. The improvement of knowledge and practice on patient blood management and use of alternatives are on the agenda of IBTO in next coming years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available