4.5 Article

128-Channel somatosensory evoked potentials in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 564-571

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.02.002

Keywords

Parkinsonian disorders; 128-Channel EEG; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Asymmetry; Differential diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders can be very difficult, especially at an early stage. In this study, we investigated whether SEP amplitude recorded by 128-channel EEG is useful for diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders, and in particular whether SEP asymmetry can differentiate corticobasal degeneration (CBGD) from other parkinsonian disorders. Methods: We recorded median nerve SEPs in 47 patients suspected of CBGD, supranuclear palsy or definite Parkinson's disease at an early stage. We compared SEP asymmetry and parietal peak amplitudes of the patients after grouping them based on their clinical diagnosis after 1-5 years of follow-up. In nine subjects the diagnosis remained unclear. Results: Three of 13 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CBGD had an abnormal SEP asymmetry. Furthermore, we found extremely high N20 amplitudes in three other patients with CBGD. However, similar asymmetry abnormalities were found in patients with other Parkinsonian disorders. Conclusion: Despite the use of 128-channel SEP recordings and analysis techniques, which are more accurate than conventional techniques, sensitivity and specificity of cortical median nerve SEP asymmetry and parietal amplitude for differentiating CBGD from other parkinsonian disorders were low at an early stage of the disease. A possible reason for this may be that the hand area of the primary somatosensory cortex was not yet affected in most CBGD patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available