4.4 Article

How have fisheries affected parasite communities?

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue 1, Pages 134-144

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S003118201400002X

Keywords

biodiversity; disease; fishing; freshwater; marine; meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. Alyce B. and Henry J. Ramey, Jr. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1115838] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand how fisheries affect parasites, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies that contrasted parasite assemblages in fished and unfished areas. Parasite diversity was lower in hosts from fished areas. Larger hosts had a greater abundance of parasites, suggesting that fishing might reduce the abundance of parasites by selectively removing the largest, most heavily parasitized individuals. After controlling for size, the effect of fishing on parasite abundance varied according to whether the host was fished and the parasite's life cycle. Parasites of unfished hosts were more likely to increase in abundance in response to fishing than were parasites of fished hosts, possibly due to compensatory increases in the abundance of unfished hosts. While complex life cycle parasites tended to decline in abundance in response to fishing, directly transmitted parasites tended to increase. Among complex life cycle parasites, those with fished hosts tended to decline in abundance in response to fishing, while those with unfished hosts tended to increase. However, among directly transmitted parasites, responses did not differ between parasites with and without fished hosts. This work suggests that parasite assemblages are likely to change substantially in composition in increasingly fished ecosystems, and that parasite life history and fishing status of the host are important in predicting the response of individual parasite species or groups to fishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available