4.4 Article

Effects of miltefosine treatment in fibroblast cell cultures and in mice experimentally infected with Neospora caninum tachyzoites

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 7, Pages 934-944

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182012000066

Keywords

miltefosine; Neospora caninum; tachyzoites; cultured fibroblasts; proliferation

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_127374/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_127374] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Miltefosine was investigated for its activity against Neospora caninum tachyzoites in vitro, and was shown to inhibit the proliferation of N. caninum tachyzoites cultured in human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) with an IC50 of 5 center dot 2 mu M. Treatment of infected cells with 25 mu M miltefosine for a period of 10 h had only a parasitostatic effect, while after 20 h of treatment parasiticidal effects were observed. This was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy of N. caninum-infected and miltefosine-treated HFF. Administration of miltefosine to N. caninum-infected Balb/c female mice at 40 mg/kg/day for 14 days resulted in 6 out of 10 mice exhibiting weight loss, ruffled coat and apathy between days 7 and 13 post-infection. In the group that received placebo, only 2 out of 8 mice succumbed to infection, but the cerebral burden was significantly higher compared to the miltefosine treatment group. In a second experiment, the time-span of treatment was reduced to 5 days, and mice were maintained without further treatment for 4 weeks. Only 2 out of 9 mice in the miltefosine treatment group exhibited signs of disease, while 8 out of 10 mice succumbed to infection in the placebo group. These results showed that miltefosine hampered the dissemination of parasites into the CNS during experimental N. caninum infection in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available