4.4 Article

Variation in fecal egg counts in horses managed for conservation purposes: individual egg shedding consistency, age effects and seasonal variation

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages 115-128

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S003118201200128X

Keywords

horses; nematodes; cyathostomins; faecal egg counts; consistency; age; climate

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC
  2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology at the University of Edinburgh
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H021868/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/H021868/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyathostomins are the most prevalent equine intestinal parasites and resistance has been reported in these nematodes against all 3 licensed anthelmintic classes. Strategies need to be developed that are less dependent upon drugs and more reliant on management-based control. To develop these we need to understand natural transmission patterns better. Here, we analysed longitudinal fecal egg count (FEC) data from 5 pony populations used for conservation purposes. We tested how egg excretion varied amongst populations and individuals, and how this was affected by age and climate. There was evidence for consistency in FECs over time at the individual level; this was generally weak and accounted for <10% of the total variance. Animals <5 years old had higher FECs and there was profound seasonal variation in FECs, with highest levels recorded in spring/summer. Effects of monthly temperature and rainfall explained most, but not all, of the observed seasonal variation and associations between climate measures and FECs were stronger in younger versus adult animals. One population was occasionally treated with anthelmintics and analysis of this population suggested that treatment substantially altered the seasonal dynamics. This paper highlights the variability in strongyle egg excretion amongst individuals and the factors involved in this variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available