4.4 Article

In vitro and in vivo behaviour of sympatric Leishmania (V.) braziliensis, L. (V.) peruviana and their hybrids

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 191-199

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182011001909

Keywords

Leishmania (Viannia); hybrids; phenotype; in vivo behaviour

Categories

Funding

  1. EC project LeishEpiNetSA [INCO-CT2005-015407]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Portugal [PTDC/CVT/112371/2009]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BPD/44450/2008, SFRH/BPD/44082/2008]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/44450/2008, PTDC/CVT/112371/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is the main cause of highly disfiguring mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) in South America. The related species L. (V.) peruviana has only been identified in simple cutaneous lesions (CL). Hybrids between L. braziliensis and L. peruviana have been reported although genetic exchange in Leishmania is considered to be rare. Here we compared growth in vitro, adaptive capacity under thermal and oxidative stress and behaviour in a hamster model, of L. braziliensis, L. peruviana, and their putative hybrids. At 24 degrees C, the optimal temperature for in vitro growth, L. braziliensis had the highest growth rate. In in vitro studies hybrid clones presented heterogeneous phenotypes, from slower growth rates, similar to L. peruviana, to higher growth rates, as observed in L. braziliensis. Hamsters infected with hybrid strains, presented the highest parasite densities and aggressive relapses at a later stage of infection. Hybrids generally presented higher plasticity and phenotypic diversity than the putative parental species, with potential eco-epidemiological implications, including an impact on the success of disease control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available