4.4 Article

Microfluidic bioassay to characterize parasitic nematode phenotype and anthelmintic resistance

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 80-88

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182010001010

Keywords

microfluidics; bioassay; Oesophagostomum dentatum; levamisole resistance; phenotype

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R 01 AI 047194]
  2. Iowa Center for Neurotoxicology
  3. Iowa State College of Engineering
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI047194, R56AI047194] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With increasing resistance to anti-parasitic drugs, it has become more important to detect and recognize phenotypes of resistant isolates. Molecular methods of detecting resistant isolates are limited at present. Here, we introduce a microfluidic bioassay to measure phenotype using parameters of nematode locomotion. We illustrate the technique on larvae of an animal parasite Oesophagostomum dentatum. Parameters of sinusoidal motion such as propagation velocity, wavelength, wave amplitude, and oscillation frequency depended on the levamisole-sensitivity of the isolate of parasitic nematode. The levamisole-sensitive isolate (SENS) had a mean wave amplitude of 135 mu m, which was larger than 123 mu m of the levamisole-resistant isolate (LEVR). SENS had a mean wavelength of 373 mu m, which was less than 393 mu m of LEVR. The mean propagation velocity of SENS, 149 mu m s(-1), was similar to LEVR, 143 mu m s(-1). The propagation velocity of the isolates was inhibited by levamisole in a concentration-dependent manner above 0.5 mu M. The EC50 for SENS was 3 mu M and the EC50 for LEVR was 10 mu M. This microfluidic technology advances present-day nematode migration assays and provides a better quantification and increased drug sensitivity. It is anticipated that the bioassay will facilitate study of resistance to other anthelmintic drugs that affect locomotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available