4.4 Article

Bayesian geostatistical modelling for mapping schistosomiasis transmission

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 13, Pages 1695-1705

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S003118200900599X

Keywords

Schistosomiasis; Schistosoma mansoni; Bayesian geostatistics; non-stationarity; overdispersion; zero-inflated model; infection intensity; Cote d'Ivoire

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [3252B0-102136, PBBSB-109011, PPOOB-102883, PPOOB-119129]
  2. Novartis Foundation
  3. Roche Research Foundation
  4. University of Queensland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Progress has been made in mapping and predicting the risk of schistosomiasis using Bayesian geostatistical inference. Applications primarily, focused on risk profiling of prevalence rather than infection intensity,, although the latter is particularly important for morbidity control. In this review, the Underlying assumptions used in a study mapping Schistosoma mansoni infection intensity in East Africa are examined. We argue that the assumption of stationarity needs to be relaxed, and that the negative binomial assumption might result in misleading inference because of a high number of excess zeros (individuals Without an infection). We developed a Bayesian geostatistical zero-inflated (ZI) regression model that assumes a non-stationary spatial process. Our model is validated with a high-quality, georeferenced database from western Cote d'Ivoire, consisting of demographic, environmental, parasitological and socio-economic data. Nearly 40% of the 3818 participating schoolchildren were infected with S. mansoni, and the Mean egg count an-long infected children was 162 eggs per gram of stool (EPG), ranging between 24 and 6768 EPG. Compared to a negative binomial and ZI Poisson and negative binomial models, the Bayesian non-stationary ZI negative binomial model showed a better fit to the data. We conclude that geostatistical ZI models produce more accurate maps Of helminth infection intensity, than the spatial negative binomial ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available