4.2 Article

Donor screening reduces the isoagglutinin titer in immunoglobulin products

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages S95-S97

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/trf.13095

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CSL Behring AG, Berne, Switzerland
  2. CSL Behring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDHemolysis reaction is a rare class effect of therapy with intravenously administered human normal immunoglobulin (IVIG). Anti-A/B isoagglutinins (isohemagglutinins) originating from donor plasma are considered a probable risk factor for hemolysis. We hypothesized that screening and exclusion of plasma obtained from donors with high isoagglutinin titers from the manufacturing process would produce a meaningful reduction of anti-A/B isoagglutinin titers of the final IVIG product. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSA donor screening method for anti-A isoagglutinins using an automated indirect agglutination test (IAT) in gel cards was developed. Industry-scale donor plasma pools and final IVIG product were prepared according to the manufacturing process of Privigen (human 10% liquid IVIG). Anti-A/B isoagglutinin levels were measured by IAT, direct agglutination test, and a flow cytometry-based assay. RESULTSScreening of plasma from 705 randomly selected donors identified 6.8% donors with high anti-A isoagglutinin titers in plasma. Exclusion of plasma from these donors resulted in a one-titer-step reduction of anti-A isoagglutinin in laboratory-scale pooled plasma. The same donor screening method applied to industry-scale production resulted in exclusion of 5.1% of donors and produced a one-titer-step reduction of both anti-A and anti-B isoagglutinin titers in the final IVIG product. CONCLUSIONAnti-A/B isoagglutinin titers in IVIG products can be reduced on an industrial scale through implementation of anti-A donor screening, which may lower the risk of hemolysis after IVIG therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available