4.3 Article

Molecular and immunological characterization of Babesia gibsoni and Babesia microti heat shock protein-70

Journal

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 328-340

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01109.x

Keywords

Babesia gibsoni; Babesia microti; heat shock protein-70; immunization; protection

Funding

  1. 21st Century COE Program (A-1)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. Bio-orientated Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serological immunoscreening was used to identify a gene encoding heat shock protein-70 from Babesia gibsoni (BgHSP-70) that showed high homology with HSP-70s from other apicomplexan parasites. This gene corresponded to a full-length cDNA containing an open reading frame of 1968 bp predicted to result in a 70-kDa mature protein consisting of 656 amino acids. Analysis of the expression levels of BgHSP-70 indicated elevated transcription from cultured parasites incubated at 40 degrees C for 1 h, but not at 30 degrees C. Interestingly, antiserum raised against recombinant BgHSP-70 protein reacted specifically not only with a 70-kDa protein of B. gibsoni but also with a corresponding native protein of B. microti (BmHSP-70), indicating the high degree of conservation of this protein. The BmHSP-70 gene was then isolated and characterized and the immunoprotective properties of recombinant BgHSP-70 (rBgHSP-70) and rBmHSP-70 were compared in vitro and in vivo. Both proteins had potent mitogenic effects on murine and canine mononuclear cells as evidenced by high proliferative responses and IFN-gamma production after stimulation. Immunization regimes in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice using rBgHSP-70 and rBmHSP-70 elicited high antibody levels, with concurrent significant reductions in peripheral parasitaemias. Taken together, these results emphasize the potential of HSP-70s as a molecular adjuvant vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available