4.4 Article

Endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - Single center experience of 112 cases

Journal

PANCREATOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 137-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.11.005

Keywords

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis; Acute pancreatitis; Endoscopic drainage/debridement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endoscopic drainage of the pancreatic pseudocysts has been accepted as a valid alternative to surgical and percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic treatment of the symptomatic walled-off necrosis was not, however, univocally accepted by all authors. The aim: The aim of this study was to assessed the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis. Methods and material: Between 2001 and 2011 one hundred and twelve patients with symptomatic walled-off necrosis were treated in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of the Medical University of Gdansk, using endoscopic drainage. The drainage system was set up by introducing endoprostheses and drains through gastric and duodenal fistulas, transpapillary, and additionally in cases when the necrosis was spreading outside of the lesser sac percutaneously. The results and complications of the endoscopic treatment were assessed retrospectively. Results: Initial success was achieved in 104/112 (92.9%) patients. Long term success was achieved in 94/112 (83.9%) patients in intention to treat analysis and 94/102 (90.4%) patients in per protocol analysis. Recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection was observed in 19/97(19.6%) patients. Procedure-related complications were observed in 29/112 patients (25.9%). Most of them were treated conservatively. Procedure-related mortality was 1.8%. Conclusions: In a large group of selected patients with symptomatic walled-off necrosis, endoscopic drainage enables high success rate with acceptable complication rate and low procedure-related mortality. Copyright (C) 2013, IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available