4.4 Article

Polymorphisms of Beta Defensins Are Associated with the Risk of Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Journal

PANCREATOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 483-490

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1159/000276987

Keywords

Acute pancreatitis; beta-Defensins; Copy number polymorphism; DEFB1; DEFB4; Severe acute pancreatitis; Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Funding

  1. Hungarian research grant (OTKA) [K67889/5K540, ETT 014/2006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Bacterial translocation from the intestinal tract plays an important role in severe acute pancreatitis (AP). Human beta-defensins are a family of antimicrobial peptides present at the mucosal surface. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the DEFB1 gene and copy number polymorphisms of the DEFB4 genes in AP. Methods: 124 AP patients (30 with mild and 94 with severe disease) and 100 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Three SNPs of the DEFB1 gene [G-20A (c.-20G -> A), C-44G (c.-44C -> G) and G-52A (c.-52G -> A)] were genotyped by Custom TaqMan (R) assay. The DEFB4 gene copy number was determined by means of a TaqMan real-time PCR assay. Results: Significantly higher frequencies of the AA genotype of G-20A (c.-20G -> A) and the AA genotype of G-52A (c.-52G -> A) were observed among the patients with severe AP (SAP) compared with the healthy controls (38 vs. 20 and 41 vs. 18%, respectively). The GG protective genotype of C-44G (c.-44C -> G) SNP was much less frequent (1%) among the patients than among the controls (9%). A higher frequency of a lower (<4) copy number of the DEFB4 gene was observed in the patients with SAP compared with the healthy controls (62 vs. 24%, respectively). Conclusions: The variations in the genes encoding human beta-defensin-1 and -2 may be associated with the risk of SAP. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available