4.3 Article

Clinical value of monitoring plasma octreotide levels during chronic octreotide long-acting repeatable therapy in carcinoid patients

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 94-100

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31816907ab

Keywords

somatostatin analogs; somatostatin receptors; symptoms; plasma drug levels; sustained release preparations; carcinoid syndrome; tachyphylaxis

Funding

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [P01 AT003960-01A1, P01 AT003960] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016042-25, P30 CA016042] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Octreotide is used to treat patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Previous reports show that octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) dose and patient body weight affect nadir plasma octreotide levels (approximately 1250, 2500, 5000, and 11,000 pg/mL for LAR doses of 10, 20, 30 and 60 mg/mo). However, plasma octreotide levels have decreased over time in patients receiving these doses of LAR. Methods: From November 2004 until July 2007, trough plasma octreotide levels were determined in 86 patients on long-term octreotide LAR therapy at doses of 30, 60, and 120 mg/mo. Changes in plasma drug levels were analyzed over time using random effects models. Results: Current plasma octreotide levels for octreotide LAR doses of 30, 60, and 120 mg/mo are approximately 2200, 5200, and 6500 pg/mL, respectively, representing a decrease of approximately 50% to 70% compared with previously reported plasma octreotide levels. The decreases in octreotide levels over time with the 30- and 60-mg/mo LAR doses are highly statistically significant (P = 0.0067, 0.0149, respectively). Conclusions: Current plasma octreotide values are significantly lower than previously reported for 30-, 60-, and 120-mg/mo LAR doses. Serial plasma octreotide value measurements should be used to determine if increasing symptoms or tumor growth are associated with suboptimal octreotide levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available