Journal
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 242-261Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269216310389348
Keywords
Mixed methods; palliative care; shared decision-making; systematic review
Categories
Funding
- Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
- Fonds quebecois de recherche sur la societe et la culture (FQRSC)
- Fonds quebecois de recherche en sante (FRSQ)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The aim of this study is to synthesize knowledge about the process of shared decision-making (SDM) in palliative care. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science were searched with core concepts: shared decisions, patient participation in decision-making, and palliative care. Titles and abstracts were screened according to inclusion criteria (original research, adult patients, Western contexts, decision-making, palliative treatment or setting), yielding 37 articles for analysis. A narrative synthesis was created using the methods of thematic analysis, conceptual mapping, and critical reflection on the synthesis process. Results demonstrate that while a majority of patients want to participate in treatment decisions to some extent, most do not achieve their preferred levels of involvement because decisions are delayed and alternative treatment options are seldom discussed. The literature regarding the process of SDM itself remains scarce in palliative care. Further research is needed in order to better understand the longitudinal, interactive, and interdisciplinary process of decision-making in palliative care.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available