4.4 Article

Seasonality, the latitudinal gradient of diversity, and Eocene insects

Journal

PALEOBIOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 374-398

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1666/09021.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Putnam Expeditionary Grants
  3. Ernst Mayr Grant
  4. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University
  5. Maurice Pechet Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the modern world, biotic diversity is typically higher in low-latitude tropical regions where there is abundant insolation (light and heat) and low thermal seasonality. Because these factors broadly covary with latitude, separating their possible effects on species diversity is difficult. The Eocene was a much more equable world, however, with low temperature seasonality extending into lower-insolation higher, cooler latitudes, allowing us to test these factors by comparing insect species diversity in (1) modern, temperate, low-insolation, highly seasonal Harvard Forest, Massachusetts, U.S.A., 42 degrees 29'N; (2) modern, tropical, high-insolation, low-seasonality La Selva, Costa Rica, 10 degrees 26'N, and; (3) Eocene, temperate, low-insolation, yet low-seasonality McAbee, British Columbia, Canada, above 50 degrees N paleolatitude. We found insect diversity at McAbee to be more similar to La Selva than to Harvard Forest, with high species richness of most groups and decreased diversity of ichneumon wasps, indicating that seasonality is key to the latitudinal diversity gradient. Further, midlatitude Eocene woody dicot diversities at McAbee, Republic (Washington, U.S.A.), and Laguna del Hunco (Argentina) are also high, similar to modern tropical samples, higher than at the modern midlatitude Harvard Forest. Modern correlations between latitude, species diversity, and seasonal climates were established some time after the Eocene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available