4.7 Article

Environmental conditions framing the first evidence of modern humans at Tam Pa Ling, Laos: A stable isotope record from terrestrial gastropod carbonates

Journal

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
Volume 511, Issue -, Pages 352-363

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.08.020

Keywords

Paleoenvironment; Land snails; Oxygen and carbon stable isotopes; Late Pleistocene

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  2. Ministry of Information, Culture and Tourism of Lao PDR
  3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
  4. CNRS, Paris [UPR2147]
  5. MNHN, Paris [UMR7206]
  6. AMIS [UMR5288]
  7. University of Strasbourg [UMR7516]
  8. Department of Human Evolution (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mainland Southeast Asia is a key region to interpret modern human migrations; however, due to a scarcity of terrestrial proxies, environmental conditions are not well understood. This study focuses on the Tam Pa Ling cave site in northeast Laos, which contains the oldest evidence for modern humans in Indochina, dating back to MIS 4 (70 +/- 8 ka). Snail remains of Camaena massiei found throughout the stratigraphic sequence contain a valuable oxygen and carbon isotope record of past local vegetation and humidity changes. Our data indicate that before the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), northeast Laos was characterized by a humid climate and forested environments. With the onset of the LGM, a major climatic shift occurred, inducing a sharp decrease in precipitation and a significant decline in woodland habitats in favor of the expansion to more open landscapes. Only during the Holocene did forests return in northeast Laos, resembling present conditions. The first Homo sapiens arriving in Indochina therefore encountered landscapes dominated by woodlands with a minor proportion of open habitats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available