4.7 Article

Modelling equable climates of the Late Cretaceous: Can new boundary conditions resolve data-model discrepancies?

Journal

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
Volume 392, Issue -, Pages 41-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.08.009

Keywords

Late Cretaceous; Maastrichtian; HadCM3; Equable climates

Funding

  1. NERC [6/28]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I005803/1, NE/C506399/1, NE/J008591/1, NE/I00582X/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/J008591/1, NE/I005803/1, NE/I00582X/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) climate and vegetation is modelled using the HadCM3L fully-coupled atmosphere-ocean model and the TRIFFID dynamic vegetation model. We investigate data-model inconsistencies in the high-latitudes and continental interiors by exploring the sensitivity of modelled terrestrial climate to vegetation treatment, changing atmospheric pCO(2) levels and the representation of Arctic seaway connections. We expand on previous work by using millennial-scale GCM runs with dynamic vegetation to allow for improved representations of ocean heat transport and terrestrial boundary conditions. Incorporating realistic vegetation drives high-latitude warming particularly during summer through reductions in surface albedo and induced atmosphere-ocean feedbacks. Resulting regional warming can exceed 10 degrees C. As pCO(2) rises some regions cool as deciduous to evergreen change increases albedo. Incorporating enhanced Arctic connectivity, reconfigured ocean heat transport drives widespread terrestrial warming of similar to 3 degrees C and >5 degrees C regionally. Applying sensitivities in combination significant palaeobotanical data-model inconsistencies in the northern high-latitudes and continental interiors remain. Further work is required to resolve climate and vegetation model deficiencies and improve the interpretation and geographic distribution of quantitative climate-sensitive geological proxies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available