4.7 Article

Long-term climate variability in continental subarctic Canada: A 6200-year record derived from stable isotopes in peat

Journal

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
Volume 298, Issue 3-4, Pages 235-246

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.09.029

Keywords

Stable isotopes; Subarctic; Sphagnum; Climate reconstruction

Funding

  1. Ahlmann Foundation
  2. Bert Bolin Centre for Climate Research (BBCC)
  3. Lagrelius Foundation
  4. Svenska Sallskapet for Antropologi och Geographi (SSAG)
  5. Royal Swedish Academy of Science
  6. EU [017008]
  7. UK Climate Change Consortium of Wales (C3W)
  8. NERC [NE/B501504, NE/G019673]
  9. NERC [NE/G019851/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B501504/1, NE/G019851/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid warming of arctic regions during recent decades has been recorded by instrumental monitoring, but the natural climate variability in the past is still sparsely reconstructed across many areas. We have reconstructed past climate changes in subarctic west-central Canada. Stable carbon and oxygen isotope ratios (delta C-13, delta O-18) were derived from a single Sphagnum fuscum plant component; alpha-cellulose isolated from stems. Periods of warmer and cooler conditions identified in this region, described in terms of a Mediaeval Climatic Anomaly and Little Ice Age were registered in the temperature reconstruction based on the delta C-13 record. Some conclusions could be drawn about wet/dry shifts during the same time interval from the delta O-18 record, humification indices and the macrofossil analysis. The results were compared with other proxy data from the vicinity of the study area. The amplitude of the temperature change was similar to that in chironomid based reconstructions, showing c. 6.5 +/- 2.3 degrees C variability in July temperatures during the past 6.2 ka. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available