4.7 Article

Carbon isotopes and event stratigraphy near the Ordovician-Silurian boundary, Yichang, South China

Journal

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
Volume 276, Issue 1-4, Pages 160-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.03.007

Keywords

Carbon isotopes; Ordovician-Silurian boundary; Hirnantian; South China; Glaciation; Mass extinction

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-122, KZCX3-SW-149]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006CB806400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40532009, 40772002]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The organic carbon isotope data through the unweathered Ordovician-Silurian boundary strata at the Wangjiawan Riverside section, which is c. 180 m southeast of the Wangjiawan North section, the GSSP for the base of the Hirnantian Stage (Upper Ordovician), show that a positive delta C-13(org) excursion begins just below the base of the Hirnantian Stage and peaks in the lower part of the N. extraordinarius Biozone. This is followed by an interval of slightly reduced delta C-13 values and a second peak of 2 parts per thousand above pre-Hirnantian values, which occurs in the lower part of the N. persculptus Biozone (upper Hirnantian). The peaks in delta C-13(org) values can be correlated well with episodes of glacial expansion described from Africa and peri-Gondwanan Europe. Evidence from sedimentological, faunal, and geochemical data from South China, as well as the evidence of glacial sediments in North Africa, all suggests a short-lived glaciation of similar to 1 Ma in the Ordovician South Pole region, consisting of at least two major pulses. The first phase of gradual glacial expansion began just before the Hirnantian Epoch and the second phase ended with rapid melting in the late Hirnantian (early N. persculptus Biozone). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available