4.7 Review

A palaeogeographic context for Neoproterozoic glaciation

Journal

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
Volume 277, Issue 3-4, Pages 158-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.03.013

Keywords

Neoproterozoic; Palaeogeography; Snowball Earth; Banded iron-formation; Cap carbonate; Giant wave ripples

Funding

  1. Harvard Club of Australia Fellowship
  2. The School of Earth and Environmental Sciences
  3. The University of Adelaide (Adelaide, South Australia)
  4. Curtin University of Technology (Perth, Western Australia)
  5. ARC Discovery Project [DP0770228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distributions of 77 Neoproterozoic glacigenic formations are shown on global palaeogeographic maps for 715 Ma (Sturtian), 635 Ma (Marinoan) and 580 Ma (Ediacaran), constructed on grounds independent of palaeoclimatic indicators. The meridional distribution of Sturtian and Marinoan deposits is biased in favour of low palaeolatitudes, whereas Ediacaran deposits are biased in favour of high palaeolatitudes. All carbonate-hosted glacigenic formations (n=22) fall within 35 degrees of the palaeoequator. Most (6 of 8) examples of periglacial polygonal sand-wedges occur at palaeolatitudes greater than 30 degrees, whereas most (8 of 9) occurrences of large syn-glacial Fe and Fe-Mn deposits lie within 30 degrees of the palaeoequator. Marinoan syndeglacial cap dolostones (n=24) decline in maximum thickness with palaeolatitude, consistent with poleward ice retreat, normal meridional temperature gradients and a small-obliquity orbit. Meridional (N-S) mean orientations of giant wave ripples in Marinoan cap dolostones from different regions (n=10) and absence of zonal (W-E) orientations are consistent with zonal wind-driven waves and not with hurricanes. In general, the results support the validity of the palaeogeographic reconstructions and the pan-glacial character of Sturtian and Marinoan ice ages. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available