4.4 Article

Restless Legs Syndrome and Painful Neuropathy-Retrospective Study. A Role for Nociceptive Deafferentation?

Journal

PAIN MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 1481-1486

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00732.x

Keywords

Restless Legs Syndrome; Small Fiber Sensory Neuropathy; Neuropathic Pain; Painful Polyneuropathy; A-Delta Fibers

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Restless legs syndrome (RLS) occurs in polyneuropathy with small fiber involvement, possibly as a peculiar form of neuropathic pain; however, the relationship between pain and RLS has been poorly investigated in polyneuropathy. Design, Setting, and Patients. We evaluated retrospectively the occurrence of RLS in 102 consecutive patients with polyneuropathy manifesting with neuropathic pain or dysesthesia, referred to the Neuromuscular Center, using the National Institutes of Health criteria for RLS. The patients were classified in subgroups characterized respectively by allodynia (hyperphenomena), with reported unpleasant sensations evoked by tactile stimuli, and hypoalgesia (hypophenomena), with absent pain sensation to pinprick, according to putative mechanisms of pain. Results. RLS was present in 41/102 patients (40.2%). It was significantly more frequent in the hypoalgesia (23/37) than in the allodynia subgroup (9/31; P = 0.008) and in the not classifiable cases (9/34; P = 0.004). Conclusions. RLS is frequent in painful polyneuropathy and is significantly associated with decreased small fiber input, thus nociceptive deafferentation may represent a factor interacting with RLS generators, possibly at spinal level. We suggest that overactivity of the spinal structures implicated in RLS may be triggered by nociceptive deafferentation in a subgroup of patients with painful polyneuropathy. Our findings, prompting a mechanistic characterization of RLS associated with painful polyneuropathy, have to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available