4.6 Article

The efficacy of a glial inhibitor, minocycline, for preventing persistent pain after lumbar discectomy: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study

Journal

PAIN
Volume 154, Issue 8, Pages 1197-1203

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.028

Keywords

Controlled study; Double-blind; Glial activation; Lumbar discectomy; Minocycline; Persistent pain; Prevention; Randomized

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minocycline strongly inhibits microglial activation, which contributes to central sensitization, a major mechanism underlying chronic pain development. We hypothesized that the perioperative administration of minocycline might decrease persistent pain after lumbar discectomy. We randomly assigned 100 patients undergoing scheduled lumbar discectomy to placebo and minocycline groups. The minocycline group received 100 mg minocycline orally, twice daily, beginning the evening before surgery and continuing for 8 days. The primary outcome was the change in lower limb pain intensity at rest between baseline and 3 months. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity on movement, the incidence of persistent pain and chronic neuropathic pain, back pain intensity at rest and on movement, and changes in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, and Roland-Morris scores at 3 months. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed for patients assessed from the day before surgery to 3 months. The decrease in lower limb pain intensity was similar in the placebo and minocycline groups, both at rest -1.7 +/- 1.6 vs -2.3 +/- 2.4 and on movement -2.5 +/- 2.1 vs -3.4 +/- 2.9. The incidence and intensity of neuropathic pain and functional scores did not differ between the minocycline and placebo groups. Exploratory analysis suggested that minocycline might be effective in a subgroup of patients with predominantly deep spontaneous pain at baseline. Perioperative minocycline administration for 8 days does not improve persistent pain after lumbar discectomy. (C) 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available