4.6 Article

Fear of pain and defensive activation

Journal

PAIN
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages 156-163

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.027

Keywords

fear; pain; dental anxiety; startle reflex; emotion; psychophysiology

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE013956, R01 DE013956-01, DE 13956] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH072850, P50 MH 72850] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fear of pain and its relationship to dental fear was investigated by measuring autonomic reactions (skin conductance and heart rate) in individuals reporting high and low dental fear when in the presence of a cue that threatened the presentation of electric shock (threat) or not (safe). Acoustic startle probes were also presented during both threat and safe periods, and the reflexive eye blink, the skin conductance response, and cardiac changes to the startle probe measured. All participants reacted with greater defensive reactivity, including potentiated startle blinks, heightened skin conductance, and cardiac deceleration in the context of threat, compared to safe, cues. Individuals reporting high dental fear were significantly more reactive during threat periods, compared to low fear individuals, showing larger blink reflexes and heightened electrodermal activity, as well as heightened autonomic responses to the startle probe itself. Individual differences in defensive reactivity persisted even after participants received a single mild shock halfway through the experiment. The data indicate that threat of shock elicits heightened defensive reactivity in those reporting high dental fear, consistent with the hypothesis that fear of potentially painful events may be a potent mediator of the anxiety involved in anticipated medical and dental treatment. (C) 2007 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available