4.6 Article

The influence of simultaneous ratings on cortical BOLD effects during painful and non-painful stimulation

Journal

PAIN
Volume 135, Issue 1-2, Pages 131-141

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.014

Keywords

fMRI; pain; rating; mechanical stimulation; insular cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This fMRI study investigates the influence of a rating procedure on BOLD signals in common pain-activated cortical brain regions. Painful and non-painful mechanical impact stimuli were applied to the left hand of healthy volunteers. Subjects performed ratings of the perceived intensity during every second stimulation period by operating a visual analogue scale with the right hand. During every other stimulus period the subjects rested passively. Pain and touch stimuli were found to activate the same cortical areas previously defined as the cortical pain matrix. General Linear Models were used to calculate contrasts between cortical activations during the rating and non-rating paradigm. In most brain regions activation following pain and touch was stronger during rating compared to non-rating conditions. Only the responses in the SI projection field of the stimulated hand following pain were not influenced by the rating procedure. Furthermore, activations in the right and left posterior insular cortex and in the left superior frontal gyrus showed an opposite pattern, namely a stronger BOLD signal during non-rating. We concluded: (1) Cortical areas regularly activated by painful stimuli may also be activated by touch stimulation. (2) Enhancement of the BOLD contrast by a rating procedure is probably an effect of closer stimulus evaluation and attention focussing. (3) In contrast to most other cortical regions, the posterior insular cortex, which is crucial for the integration of interoceptive afferent input, shows stronger responses in the absence of ratings, which points to a unique role of this region in the processing of somato-visceral information. (c) 2007 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available