4.7 Review

Using fragmentation trees and mass spectral trees for identifying unknown compounds in metabolomics

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 52-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.002

Keywords

Fragmentation tree; Ion tree; Mass spectral tree; Mass spectrometry; Metabolite identification; Metabolomics; MSn; Multi-stage analysis; Tandem mass spectrometry; Unknown compound

Funding

  1. Direct For Biological Sciences [1139644] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1139644] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1153491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. NIDDK NIH HHS [U24 DK097154] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification of unknown metabolites is the bottleneck in advancing metabolomics, leaving interpretation of metabolomics results ambiguous. The chemical diversity of metabolism is vast, making structure identification arduous and time consuming. Currently, comprehensive analysis of mass spectra in metabolomics is limited to library matching, but tandem mass spectral libraries are small compared to the large number of compounds found in the biosphere, including xenobiotics. Resolving this bottleneck requires richer data acquisition and better computational tools. Multi-stage mass spectrometry (MSn) trees show promise to aid in this regard. Fragmentation trees explore the fragmentation process, generate fragmentation rules and aid in sub-structure identification, while mass spectral trees delineate the dependencies in multi-stage MS of collision-induced dissociations. This review covers advancements over the past 10 years as a tool for metabolite identification, including algorithms, software and databases used to build and to implement fragmentation trees and mass spectral annotations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available