4.3 Article

The Impact of Early Age at First Childbirth on Maternal and Infant Health

Journal

PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 259-284

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01290.x

Keywords

Age at first pregnancy; adolescent pregnancy; maternal nutritional status; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality; preterm; premature; low birthweight; still birth; neonatal death; neonatal mortality

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD052460] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this review was to assess whether early age at first childbirth is associated with increased risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. Early age at childbirth is variously defined in studies of its effect on maternal and infant health. In this systematic review, we limit analysis to studies of at least moderate quality that examine first births among young mothers, where young maternal age is defined as low gynaecological age (=2 years since menarche) or as a chronological age =16 years at conception or delivery. We conduct meta-analyses for specific maternal or infant health outcomes when there are at least three moderate quality studies that define the exposure and outcome in a similar manner and provide odds ratios or risk ratios as their effect estimates. We conclude that the overall evidence of effect for very young maternal age (<15 years or <2 years post-menarche) on infant outcomes is moderate; that is, future studies are likely to refine the estimate of effect or precision but not to change the conclusion. Evidence points to an impact of young maternal age on low birthweight and preterm birth, which may mediate other infant outcomes such as neonatal mortality. The evidence that young maternal age increases risk for maternal anaemia is also fairly strong, although information on other nutritional outcomes and maternal morbidity/mortality is less clear. Many of the differences observed among older teenagers with respect to infant outcomes may be because of socio-economic or behavioural differences, although these may vary by country/setting. Future, high quality observational studies in low income settings are recommended in order to address the question of generalisability of evidence. In particular, studies in low income countries need to consider low gynaecological age, rather than simply chronological age, as an exposure. As well, country-specific studies should measure the minimum age at which childbearing for teens has similar associations with health as childbearing for adults. This tipping point may vary by the underlying physical and nutritional health of girls and young women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available