4.3 Review

International migration and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Journal

PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 575-592

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01230.x

Keywords

gestational diabetes mellitus; migrants

Funding

  1. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec (FRSQ)
  2. Institut national de la sante et de la recherche medicale (INSERM
  3. France)
  4. Strategic Initiatives and Innovations Directorate of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gagnon AJ, McDermott S, Rigol-Chachamovich J, Bandyopadhyay M, Stray-Pedersen B, Stewart D, for the ROAM Collaboration. International migration and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2011; 25: 575-592. Influxes of migrant women of childbearing age to receiving countries have made their perinatal health status a key priority for many governments. The international research collaboration Reproductive Outcomes And Migration(ROAM) reviewed published studies to assess whether migrants in countries of resettlement have a greater risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than women in receiving countries. Asystematic review of the literature from Medline, Embase, PsychInfo and CINAHL from 1990 to 2009 included studies of migrant women and GDM. Studies were excluded if there was no cross-border movement or comparison group or if the receiving country was not the country of resettlement. Studies were assessed for quality, analysed descriptively and meta-analysed. Twenty-four reports (representing >120 000 migrants) met our inclusion criteria. Migrants were described primarily by geographic origin; other relevant aspects (e.g. time in country, language fluency) were rarely studied. Migrants' results for GDM were worse than those for receiving-country women in 79% of all studies. Meta-analyses showed that, compared with receiving-country women, Caribbean, African, European and Northern European women were at greater risk of GDM, while North Africans and North Americans had risks similar to receiving-country women. Although results of the 31 comparisons of Asians, East Africans or non-Australian Oceanians were too heterogeneous to provide a single GDM risk estimate for migrant women, only one comparison was below the receiving-country comparison group, all others presented a higher risk estimate. The majority of women migrants to resettlement countries are at greater risk for GDM than women resident in receiving countries. Research using clear, specific migrant definitions, adjusting for relevant risk factors and including other aspects of migration experiences is needed to confirm and understand these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available