4.4 Article

Proteomic investigation of Sri Lankan hump-nosed pit viper (Hypnale hypnale) venom

Journal

TOXICON
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 164-170

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.11.231

Keywords

Hypnale hypnale; Venom proteomics; Reverse-phase HPLC; Tandem mass spectrometry; N-terminal sequence; Phospholipase A(2)

Funding

  1. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia [RG521-HTM13, UM/MOHE HIRGA E000040-20001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hump-nosed pit viper, Hypanle hypnale, contributes to snakebite mortality and morbidity in Sri Lanka. Studies showed that the venom is hemotoxic and nephrotoxic, with some biochemical and antigenic properties similar to the venom of Calloselasma rhodostoma (Malayan pit viper). To further characterize the complexity composition of the venom, we investigated the proteome of a pooled venom sample from >10 Sri Lankan H. hypnale with reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (rp-HPLC), sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and peptide sequencing (tandem mass-spectrometry and/or N-terminal sequencing). The findings ascertained that two phospholipase A(2) subtypes (E6-PLA(2), W6-PLA(2)) dominate the toxin composition by 40.1%, followed by snake venom metalloproteases (36.9%), L-amino acid oxidase (11.9%), C-type lectins (5.5%), serine proteases (33%) and others (2.3%). The presence of the major toxins correlates with the venom's major pathogenic effects, indicating these to be the principal target toxins for antivenom neutralization. This study supports the previous finding of PLA(2) dominance in the venom but diverges from the view that H. hypnale venom has low expression of large enzymatic toxins. The knowledge of the composition and abundance of toxins is essential to elucidate the pathophysiology of H. hypnale envenomation and to optimize antivenom formulation in the future. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available