4.1 Article

Heart Rate Turbulence Impairment and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Journal

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 920-928

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02779.x

Keywords

heart rate turbulence; systemic sclerosis; ventricular arrhythmias; cardiac autonomic dysfunction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods: Forty-five patients with scleroderma (aged 54.6 +/- 14.7 years) and 30 healthy sex- and age-matched subjects were examined. In addition to routine studies, 24-hour Holter monitoring with assessment of HRT was performed. Results: As compared to controls, HRT was significantly impaired in systemic sclerosis patients. Abnormal HRT defined as turbulence onset (TO) >= 0.0% and/or turbulence slope (TS) < 2.5 ms/RR (ms/RR interval) was found in 19 (42%) scleroderma patients and in no members of the control group. Serious ventricular arrhythmias Lown class IV (VA-LownIV), for example, couplets and/or nonsustained ventricular tachycardias, were observed in 16 (36%) scleroderma patients. The median value of TS was significantly lower in systemic sclerosis patients with VA-LownIV than in patients without VA-LownIV (3.68 vs 7.00 ms/RR, P = 0.02). The area under curve of ROC analysis for prediction of VA-LownIV was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.87) and revealed that TS < 9.0 ms/RR was associated with VA-Lown IV occurrence, with sensitivity of 93.7% and specificity of 44.8%. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that lower values of TS were associated with VA-LownIV occurrence (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.12, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients with systemic sclerosis are characterized by significant HRT impairment. Assessment of HRT and especially TS is useful in the identification of patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias. (PACE 2010; 920-928).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available