4.2 Article

Revision Stapedotomy: Operative Findings and Hearing Results. A Prospective Study of 652 Cases From the Otology-Neurotology Database

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 875-882

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181e8f1da

Keywords

Hearing results; Otology-Neurotology Database; Otosclerosis; Revision surgery; Stapedotomy; Stapes surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify the causes of failure of primary stapes surgery and to evaluate the hearing results of revision stapes surgery in a consecutive series of 652 cases. Study Design: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Six hundred thirty-four patients who underwent 652 consecutive revision stapes operations from April 1992 to December 2007 were enrolled in this study. Main Outcome Measures: Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation using conventional audiometry, namely, airbone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds, were assessed. Postoperative audiometry was performed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months and then annually for 15 years. Results: The most frequently identified reason for primary surgery failure was incus erosion (27.6%) and prosthesis displacement (18.2%). The postoperative ABG was closed to 10 dB or less and 20 dB or less in 63.4 and 74.6% of cases, respectively. The mean 4-frequency postoperative ABG was 11.5 dB as compared with 28 dB preoperatively (mean difference, 16.5 dB; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1-17.9 dB, p < 0.0001). The mean 4-frequency postoperative air-conduction thresholds were 45.7 dB compared with 58.7 dB preoperatively (mean difference, 13 dB; 95% CI, 11.4-14.6 dB, p < 0.0001). The mean 4-frequency postoperative bone-conduction thresholds were 34 dB compared with 30.6 dB preoperatively (mean difference, -3.5 dB; 95% CI, -4.4 to -2.5 dB, p < 0.0001). A significant postoperative sensorineural hearing loss (>15 dB) was observed in 2.9% of cases in this series. Conclusion: Improvement of a conductive hearing loss after initial unsuccessful primary or revision stapes surgery can be accomplished with further revision but is occasionally modest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available