4.2 Article

Anatomic Considerations of Cochlear Morphology and Its Implications for Insertion Trauma in Cochlear Implant Surgery

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 471-477

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181a32c0d

Keywords

Cochlear anatomy; Cochlear implant; Insertion trauma

Funding

  1. Technology Foundation STW [LNN. 6122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: The goal of this study is to analyze the 3-dimensional anatomy of the cochlear spiral and to investigate the consequences of its course to insertion trauma during cochlear implantation. Background: Insertion trauma in cochlear implant surgery is a feared surgical risk, potentially causing neural degeneration and altered performance of the implant. In literature, insertion trauma is reported to occur at specific locations. This has been ascribed to surgical technique and electrode design in relation to the size of the scala tympani. This study investigates whether there is an underlying anatomic substrate serving as a potential source for insertion trauma at these specific locations. Methods: The 3-dimensional path of the cochlear spiral of 8 human temporal bones was determined by segmentation, skeletonization, distance mapping, and wave propagation technique applied on microcomputer tomography images. Potential pressure points along this path were estimated with linear regression. Results: The cochlear lumen shows a noncontinuous spiraling path leading to potential pressure points during cochlear implantation at the basilar membrane in the region of 180 to 225 (12-14 mm) and 725 degrees (22-26 mm) and at the floor of the scala tympani around 0 to 90, 225 to 270, and 405 to 450 degrees. Conclusion: Our data favor the idea that the intrinsic 3-dimensional cochlear morphology contributes to the risk for insertion trauma during cochlear implantation at specific locations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available