4.5 Review

Macrolide Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-analysis

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 148, Issue 3, Pages 366-373

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812470427

Keywords

rhinitis; sinusitis; macrolide; chronic rhinosinusitis; chronic sinusitis; human; adult; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1RR0249864]
  2. National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [KL2 RR025015]
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [KL2TR000421] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [KL2RR025015, UL1RR025014] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. The objective of this study was to systematically review patient-reported outcomes of long-term macrolide therapy, compared with any other treatment, for adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Data Sources. EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched in October 2011. Review Methods. A total of 1216 citations were screened initially by a single author, 23 full-text manuscripts were evaluated by 2 authors using structured data abstraction forms to assess for inclusion criteria and study quality, and 3 studies were included in the final review. Results. This review finds that 3 prospective clinical studies have evaluated the effect of macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis. Based on the limited data, there is limited scientific evidence to support the use of long-term macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis. Conclusion. Further clinical research is needed to determine whether there may be a subgroup effect based on the underlying inflammatory disease process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available