4.5 Article

Screening of SLC26A4, FOXI1, KCNJ10, and GJB2 in Bilateral Deafness Patients with Inner Ear Malformation

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages 972-978

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812439670

Keywords

FOXI1; GJB2; inner ear malformation; KCNJ10; nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss; SLC26A4

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB504502]
  2. National Natural Science Fund of China [30973306]
  3. Key Nature Fund of Guangdong Province [8251008901000016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Bilateral nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss associated with inner ear malformation is closely related to genetics. SLC26A4 is considered to be the major involved gene. Recently, FOXI1 and KCNJ10 mutations have been linked to enlarged vestibular aqueducts and GJB2 mutations linked to temporal bone malformation. The authors aimed to investigate the mutation spectrums of these genes in Chinese patients with bilateral hearing impairment associated with inner ear malformation. Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Affiliated hospital of the university. Subjects and Methods. The authors analyzed the GJB2, SLC26A4, FOXI1, and KCNJ10 gene sequences in 43 patients presenting with bilateral hearing impairment associated with inner ear malformation using pyrosequencing and direct DNA sequencing. Results. In total, 74.4% (32/43) of patients carried at least 1 of 14 pathogenic SLC26A4 mutations, including 6 novel mutations and 4 polymorphisms. Patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts had a higher rate of SLC26A4 mutation than Mondini dysplasia patients. No FOXI1 or KCNJ10 potential pathogenic mutation was present, and GJB2 biallelic pathogenic mutations were uncommon (2.3%; 1/43). No significant correlation was observed between the genotype and phenotype of SLC26A4 mutations. Conclusion. SLC26A4 accounts for 74.4% of inner ear malformations in our cohort, whereas FOXI1, KCNJ10, and GJB2 mutations are not common. Other possible genes or external factors may contribute to this multibranch abnormality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available