4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Modeling the Measurements of Cochlear Microcirculation and Hearing Function after Loud Noise

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages 463-469

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811407829

Keywords

Cochlea; stria vascularis; microcirculation; ABR; in vivo fluorescence microscopy; animal model; noise-induced hearing loss; NIHL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Recent findings support the crucial role of microcirculatory disturbance and ischemia for hearing impairment especially after noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The aim of this study was to establish an animal model for in vivo analysis of cochlear microcirculation and hearing function after a loud noise to allow precise measurements of both parameters in vivo. Study Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Animal study. Subjects and Methods. After assessment of normacusis (0 minutes) using evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), noise (106-dB sound pressure level [SPL]) was applied to both ears in 6 guinea pigs for 30 minutes while unexposed animals served as controls. In vivo fluorescence microscopy of the stria vascularis capillaries was performed after surgical exposure of 1 cochlea. ABR measurements were derived from the contralateral ear. Results. After noise exposure, red blood cell velocity was reduced significantly by 24.3% (120 minutes) and further decreased to 44.5% at the end of the observation (210 minutes) in contrast to stable control measurements. Vessel diameters were not affected in both groups. A gradual decrease of segmental blood flow became significant (38.1%) after 150 minutes compared with controls. Hearing thresholds shifted significantly from 20.0 +/- 5.5 dB SPL (0 minutes) to 32.5 +/- 4.2 dB SPL (60 minutes) only in animals exposed to loud noise. Conclusion. With regard to novel treatments targeting the stria vascularis in NIHL, this standardized model allows us to analyze in detail cochlear microcirculation and hearing function in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available