4.5 Article

Keratocystic odontogenic tumor associated with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: Similar behavior to sporadic type?

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages 179-183

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.10.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Cientifico y Humanistico (Scientific and Humanistic Council), Central University of Venezuela

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the expression of proliferative markers and p53 in keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) sporadic type and KCOT associated with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed a cross-sectional study. A total of 19 patients with KCOT were selected from the Oral Pathology Laboratory archives, Central University of Venezuela, from 1995 to 2005. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve cases corresponded to sporadic KCOT, and seven cases were associated with NBCCS. Immunohistochemical analysis for p53, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and Ki-67 was performed in all 19 cases. RESULTS: Of the seven cases associated with NBCCS, six (86%) were positive for PCNA. From the 12 sporadic cases, nine (75%) were positive for PCNA. Only one case of sporadic KCOT showed Ki-67 positivity. Five of 12 (42%) cases of sporadic KCOT were positive for p53, and only one (14%) case associated with NBCCS was positive for p53. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the analysis of the expression of PCNA, Ki-67, and p53, there appears to be no evidence to indicate higher aggressiveness in growth and infiltrative behavior in syndromic KCOT compared with the sporadic type. Therefore, surgical treatment may be approached in the same manner in KCOT sporadic and syndromic with the goal of minimizing recurrence. (C) 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available