4.5 Article

Carbamates: A study on genotoxic, cytotoxic, and apoptotic effects induced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 834-844

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.03.011

Keywords

Apoptosis; Carbamates; CBMN-cyt assay; CHO-K1 cells; Neutral red; MTT assays

Categories

Funding

  1. National University of La Plata [11/N699, 11/N746]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET, PIP) from Argentina [0344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro effects of the carbamates pirimicarb and zineb and their formulations Aficida(R) (50% pirimicarb) and Azzurro(R) (70% zineb), respectively, were evaluated in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. Whereas the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus cytome assay was employed to test for genotoxicity, MTT, neutral red (NR), and apoptosis evaluation were used as tests for estimating cell viability and succinic dehydrogenase activity, respectively. Concentrations tested were 10-300 mu g/ml for pirimicarb and Aficida(R), and 1-50 mu g/ml for zineb and Azzurro(R). All compounds were able to increase the frequency of micronuclei. A marked reduction in the nuclear division index was observed after treatment with 5 mu g/ml of zineb and Azzurro(R) and 10 mu g/ml of Azzurro(R). Alterations in the cellular morphology not allowing the recognition of binucleated cells exposed to 300 mu g/ml pirimicarb and Aficida(R) as well as 10-50 mu g/ml zineb and Azzurro(R). All four compounds induced inhibition of both cell viability and succinic dehydrogenase activity and trigger apoptosis in CHO-K1 cells, at least when exposed for 24 h. The data herein demonstrate the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects exerted by these carbamates and reveal the potential risk factor of these pesticides, still extensively used worldwide, for both human health and the environment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available