4.5 Article

The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 2141-2150

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1856-y

Keywords

Back pain; Bisphosphonate; Osteoporosis; Teriparatide; Vertebral fracture

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Company
  2. Procter Gamble
  3. Lilly
  4. Amgen
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Merck
  7. Pfizer
  8. Servier
  9. Zelos
  10. Takeda
  11. Novartis
  12. Sanofi Aventis
  13. Aventis
  14. Alliance for Better Bone Health
  15. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  16. Roche Diagnostics
  17. Warner Chilcott

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures. This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate. In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 mu g/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting a parts per thousand yen30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety. At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported a parts per thousand yen30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events. Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available