4.5 Review

Epigenetic influences in the developmental origins of osteoporosis

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 401-410

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1671-5

Keywords

Developmental origins; Epigenetic; Osteoporosis

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A620_1014] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [U1475000001, MC_UP_A620_1014] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem due to consequent fragility fractures; data from the UK suggest that up to 50% of women and 20% men aged 50 years will have an osteoporosis-related fracture in their remaining lifetime. Skeletal size and density increase from early embryogenesis through intrauterine, infant, childhood and adult life to reach a peak in the third to fourth decade. The peak bone mass achieved is a strong predictor of later osteoporosis risk. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between early growth and later bone mass, both at peak and in later life, and also with reduced risk of hip fracture. Mother-offspring cohorts have allowed the elucidation of some of the specific factors in early life, such as maternal body build, lifestyle and 25(OH)-vitamin D status, which might be important. Most recently, the phenomenon of developmental plasticity, whereby a single genotype may give rise to different phenotypes depending on the prevailing environment, and the science of epigenetics have presented novel molecular mechanisms which may underlie previous observations. This review will give an overview of these latter developments in the context of the burden of osteoporosis and the wider data supporting the link between the early environment and bone health in later life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available