4.5 Article

Prevalence of vertebral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: revisiting the role of glucocorticoids

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 581-587

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1584-3

Keywords

Corticosteroid induced osteoporosis; Inflammation; Osteoporosis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Vertebral fractures

Funding

  1. Wyeth
  2. Abbott
  3. Novartis
  4. Amgen
  5. Lilly
  6. MSD
  7. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a convenient tool for the diagnosis of vertebral fracture in RA. Optimal control of inflammation may be an effective means to protect against vertebral fractures. The aim of this case-control study was to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VFs) in patients with RA using VFA technology. Consecutive women (N = 101, 56.1 +/- 14.2 years) with RA (mean disease duration, 14.9 +/- 10 years) were recruited in the study. Clinical and biological statuses and treatments including glucocorticoids were assessed. Controls (N = 303), randomly selected from the general population, were individually matched to each case for age. The prevalences of osteoporosis were 55.4% and 10.5% in patients and controls, respectively. Among the subjects, 21.7% and 4.2% had a vertebral fracture in the RA and control groups, respectively. Compared with controls, patients with RA had an increased risk of VFs: odds ratio (OR) (CI 95%) adjusted on body mass index was 6.5 (3.1, 13.9). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, VFs were independently associated with presence of non-vertebral fractures (OR = 9.2 [2.5-33.5]), presence of a fall in the previous year (OR = 4.6 [1.2-18.3]), current use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (OR = 0.05 [0.004, 0.51]) and current use of steroids (OR = 0.17 [0.04, 0.67]). Rheumatoid arthritis is a risk factor of VF (OR = 6.5). VFA is a convenient tool for this diagnosis. Presence of VF is inversely related to the use of DMARD and glucocorticoids, enhancing the hypothesis that an appropriate control of the disease may be a protective factor against bone fragility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available