4.6 Article

Establishment of a reliable and reproducible murine osteoarthritis model

Journal

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 2013-2020

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.09.012

Keywords

Osteoarthritis; Animal model; Destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM); C57BL/6; Exercise

Funding

  1. Inha University Research Grant
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [20133036045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Many osteoarthritis (OA) models have been developed in mice to understand OA progression and evaluate new OA therapies. However, the individual variation of the joint lesions remains a critical problem in most of the current OA models. We established an OA model in C57BL16 mice that is more reproducible and amenable to therapeutic intervention by controlling their movement. Design: OA was induced in 9-week-old C57BL/6 mice by destabilizing the medial meniscus. The mice were then raised in the standard cage for free movement or in a confined cage customized to restrict movement. Mice in the confined cage were subjected to no exercise or exercise of 400, 800, and 1200 m/day. Results: OA lesions of mice in the confined cage were more severe in the exercise group and showed much less variation. However, the patterns of OA lesions over time were quite different depending on the amount of daily exercise; the patterns increased linearly until 8 weeks in 400 m/day exercise group, but showed plateauing after 4 weeks in 800 m/day and 1200 m/day groups. The validity of our novel OA model with movement control was proven by successfully discriminating the therapeutic effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) in histological scores, while the OA model using standard caging showed a statistically insignificant difference. Conclusion: The mouse OA model using the confine cage and enforced periodic exercise of mice is more reproducible and reliable than standard caging methods. (C) 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available