4.7 Article

Histone deacetylase inhibitor attenuates neurotoxicity of clioquinol in PC12 cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 331, Issue -, Pages 112-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.013

Keywords

Clioquinol; Deacetylation of histones; Histone deacetylase inhibitor; Subacute myeloopticoneuropathy

Funding

  1. MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [24591279, 22590945]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan [H23-Nanchi-Ippan-017]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24591279, 24790899, 22590945, 25461295] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clioquinol is considered to be a causative agent of subacute myelo-optico neuropathy (SMON), although the pathogenesis of SMON is yet to be elucidated. We have previously shown that clioquinol inhibits nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced Trk autophosphorylation in PC12 cells transformed with human Trk cDNA. To explore the further mechanism of neuronal damage by clioquinol, we evaluated the acetylation status of histones in PC12 cells. Clioquinol reduced the level of histone acetylation, and the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor Trichostatin A upregulated acetylated histones and prevented the neuronal cell damage caused by clioquinol. In addition, treatment with HDAC inhibitor decreased neurite retraction and restored the inhibition of NGF-induced Trk autophosphorylation by clioquinol. Thus, clioquinol induced neuronal cell death via deacetylation of histones, and HDAC inhibitor alleviates the neurotoxicity of clioquinol. Clioquinol is now used as a potential medicine for malignancies and neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, HDAC inhibitors can be used as a candidate medicine for the prevention of its side effects on neuronal cells. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available