4.6 Review

The impact of waiting for total joint replacement on pain and functional status: a systematic review

Journal

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 1420-1427

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.05.008

Keywords

Osteoarthritis; Total joint replacement; Waiting list; Functional status; Pain; Natural course

Funding

  1. Department of Rheumatology (St Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To systematically describe changes in pain and functioning in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) awaiting total joint replacement (TJR), and to assess determinants of this change. Methods: MEDLINE (R), EMBASE, CINAHL (R) and Cochrane Database were searched through June 2008. The reference lists of eligible publications were reviewed. Studies that monitored pain and functioning in patients with hip or knee OA during the waiting list for TJR were analyzed. Data were collected with a pre-specified collection tool. Methodological quality was assessed and a best-evidence analysis was performed to summarize results. Results: Fifteen studies, of which two were of high quality, were included and involved 788 hip and 858 knee patients (mean age 59-72 and main wait 42-399 days). There was strong evidence that pain (in hip and knee OA) and self-reported functioning (in hip OA) do not deteriorate during a <180 days wait. Conflicting evidence was established for the change on self-reported functioning in patients with knee OA waiting <180 days. Moreover, strong evidence was found for an association between the female gender and intensified pain. Conclusion: Patients with CA do not experience deterioration in pain or self-reported functional status whilst waiting <180 days for TJR. Changes over a longer waiting period are unclear. To strengthen and complement the present evidence, further high-quality studies are needed, in which preferably also performance-based measures are used. (C) 2009 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available