4.3 Article

Factors affecting poaching risk to Vulnerable Andean bears Tremarctos ornatus in the Cordillera de Merida, Venezuela:: space, parks and people

Journal

ORYX
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 437-447

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0030605308006996

Keywords

Andean bear; human-wildlife conflict; poaching; protected areas; spatial autocorrelation; Tremarctos ornatus; Venezuela

Funding

  1. Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas (IVIC)
  2. Iniciativa de Especies Amenazadas of Provita
  3. Venezuelan Fondo Nacional de Ciencia
  4. Tecnologia, e Investigacion, Idea Wild
  5. International Bear Association
  6. Cleveland Metroparks Zoo
  7. Rufford Small Grants for Nature Conservation
  8. Denver Zoological Foundation
  9. Pittsburgh Zoo and PGG Aquarium, Fundacion Gran Mariscal de Ayacucho
  10. National Parks Institute
  11. Centro de Ecologia of IVIC
  12. Laboratorio de Manejo y Conservacion de Fauna Silvestre of Universidad Simon Bolivar
  13. Fundacion AndigenA and EcoVida
  14. FUDENA
  15. Fundacion AndigenA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Worldwide, many, large mammals are threatened by poaching. However, understanding the causes of poaching is difficult when both hunter and hunted are elusive. One alternative is to apply regression models to opportunistically-collected data but doing so without accounting for inherent biases may result in misleading conclusions. To demonstrate a straightforward method to account for Such biases, and to guide further research on an elusive Vulnerable species, we visualized spatio-temporal poaching patterns in 844 Andean bear Tremarctos ornatus presence reports from the Cordillera de Merida, Venezuela. To create maps of poaching risk we fitted two logistic regression models to a Subset of 287 precisely georeferenced reports, one ignoring and one including spatial autocorrelation. Whereas the variance explained by both model., was low, the second had better fit and predictive ability, and indicated that protected status had a significant positive effect on reducing poaching risk. Poaching risk increased at lower altitudes, where all indicators of human disturbance increased, although there was scant evidence that human-bear conflicts are a major direct trigger of poaching events. Because highest-risk areas Were different from areas with most bear report:3, we speculate that hunting may be driven by opportunistic encounters, rather than by purposeful searches in high-quality bear habitat. Further research comparing risk maps with bear abundance models and data on poaching behaviour will be invaluable for clarifying poaching causes and for identifying management strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available