4.0 Article

Immunoexpression of Steroid Hormone Receptors and Proliferation Markers in Uterine Leiomyoma and Normal Myometrial Tissues from the Miniature Pig, Sus scrofa

Journal

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 450-457

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0192623315621414

Keywords

miniature pig; uterine leiomyoma; fibroid; steroid hormone receptors; proliferation markers; immunoexpression

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 ES021196-15, ZIA ES021196-22, ZIA ES021196-23] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uterine leiomyomas in miniature pet pigs occur similarly to those in women with regard to frequency, age, parity, and cycling. Clinical signs, gross, and histologic features of the porcine tumors closely resemble uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) in women. Although fibroids are hormonally responsive in women, the roles of estrogen and progesterone have not been fully elucidated. In this study, immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of the steroid hormone receptors, estrogen receptor alpha (ER-), estrogen receptor beta (ER-) and progesterone receptor (PR), and cell proliferation markers, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 in tumor and matched myometrial tissues sampled from miniature pigs. A quickscore method was used to determine receptor expression and labeling indices were calculated for the markers. ER-/ and PR were localized to the nuclei of smooth muscle cells in both tissues. PR expression was intense and diffuse throughout all tissues, with correlation between tumors and matched myometria. Conversely, ER- expression was variable between the myometrial and tumor tissues, as well as between animals. ER- expression was low. PCNA and Ki-67 were localized to the nucleus and expression varied among tumors; however, normal tissues were overall negative. These findings support further investigation into the use of the miniature pig as a model of fibroids in women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available