4.2 Review

Reliability of muscle strength assessment in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 52-61

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000008

Keywords

Stroke; Strength; Isokinetic dynamometer; Knee; Intraclass correlation coefficient

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: associated with reduced peak muscle torque. Objective: To systematically investigate and organize the evidence of the reliability of muscle strength evaluation measures in post-stroke survivors with chronic hemiparesis. Data Sources: Two assessors independently searched four electronic databases in January 2014 (Medline, Scielo, CINAHL, Embase). Study Selection: Inclusion criteria comprised studies on reliability on muscle strength assessment in adult post-stroke patients with chronic hemiparesis. Data Extraction: We extracted outcomes from included studies about reliability data, measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and/or similar. The meta-analyses were conducted only with isokinetic data. Results: Of 450 articles, eight articles were included for this review. After quality analysis, two studies were considered of high quality. Five different joints were analyzed within the included studies (knee, hip, ankle, shoulder, and elbow). Their reliability results varying from low to very high reliability (ICCs from 0.48 to 0.99). Results of meta-analysis for knee extension varying from high to very high reliability (pooled ICCs from 0.89 to 0.97), for knee flexion varying from high to very high reliability (pooled ICCs from 0.84 to 0.91) and for ankle plantar flexion showed high reliability (pooled ICC=0.85). Conclusion: Objective muscle strength assessment can be reliably used in lower and upper extremities in post-stroke patients with chronic hemiparesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available