3.9 Article

The juvenile bone cyst - Treatment with continuous decompression using cannulated screws

Journal

ORTHOPADE
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 256-262

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1407-9

Keywords

Juvenile bone cyst; Unicameral bone cyst; Cannulated screws; Decompression; Pathologic fracture

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A unicameral bone cyst (UBC) may be caused by an intraosseous venous obstruction with the accumulation of interstitial fluid. Therefore, continuous decompression of the fluid using cannulated screws would represent a causal therapeutic approach. The clinical and radiographic follow-up of 17 patients with UBCs treated by curettage and mechanical decompression using cannulated screws was evaluated retrospectively. Radiographic examination revealed the following results: complete healing of the lesion (n=2), persistent defect after healing (n=6), persistent lesion (n=6), and recurrent cyst after temporary remodeling (n=3). No pathologic fracture was subsequently observed in the group of lesions that had a persistent defect after healing. A persistent lesion occurred in the proximal femur in 75% of the cases and in the proximal humerus in 50% of the cases. Continuous decompression using cannulated screws can be applied in UBCs of the proximal humerus in patients with recurrent fractures and subjective complaints. However, treatment failures are common and comparable to other therapeutic approaches. Therefore, conservative treatment must be discussed critically. Healing with residual defect must be regarded as a good treatment result, and additional operative procedures with the objective of radiographic cosmetics should not be done. Because of poor results and long-term disability related to weight bearing, treatment of UBCs with cannulated screws cannot be recommended in lesions located in the proximal femur. In these cases, immediate surgical stabilization is the appropriate procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available