Journal
ORGANOMETALLICS
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 108-116Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om900854m
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- EPSRC
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F037465/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- EPSRC [EP/F037465/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The reactions between GeCl(2)(1,4-dioxane) and 2 equiv of [{(Me(3)Si)(2)CH}(C(6)H(4)-2-NMe(2))P]K and between SnCl(2) and 2 equiv of [{(Me(3)Si)(2)CH}(C(6)H(4)-2-NMe(2))P]Li give the corresponding diphosphatetrylenes [{(Me(3)Si)(2)CH}(C(6)H(4)-2-NMe(2))P](2)E [E = Ge(5), Sn (6)] as orange crystalline solids in good yield. X-ray crystallography reveals that 5 and 6 adopt similar, but not identical structures in the solid state; each crystallizes its a discrete monomeric diphosphatetrylene, with one chelating phosphide ligand and one ligand bound solely through its P atom. The two compounds differ in the orientation of the noncoordinated nitrogen atom: in 5 the Ge center dot center dot center dot N distance ( > 5 angstrom) is clearly too great for bonding, whereas in 6 the Sn center dot center dot center dot N distance is just 3.306(3) angstrom, implying a weak Sn-N bonding interaction. In solution both 5 and 6 exhibit dynamic behavior. However, whereas 5 undergoes both chelating-terminal ligand exchange and epimerization via inversion at phosphorus, compound 6 adopts a pseudo-trigonal-bipyramidal structure in solution at low temperatures. DFT calculations suggest that such a species, the putative intermediate in the associative mechanism for chelating-terminal ligand exchange, is a low-energy minimum on the potential energy surface.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available