4.6 Article

Application of ROTEM to assess hypercoagulability in patients with lung cancer

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 135, Issue 6, Pages 1075-1080

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.03.021

Keywords

Lung cancer; Venous thromboembolism; Risk assessment; Thromboelastometry; Coagulation

Funding

  1. NISCHR Biomedical Research Unit (BRU) [BRO1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/C513037/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I019405/1, EP/C513037/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Marie Curie [MCCC-FCO-11-C] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/I019405/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality Currently, no test reliably identifies patients at increased risk of developing VTE who would therefore benefit from prophylactic intervention. The aim of the current study was to evaluate rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in identifying VTE risk in patients with lung cancer. We also compared parameters of ROTEM in patients with limited and extensive disease. Methods: Parameters of ROTEM were measured in 67 patients with lung cancer and 72 age-matched healthy controls and compared with conventional markers of haemostasis. Patients were followed up for 12 months and VTE incidence recorded. Results: Lung cancer patients had a reduced clotting time (CT), increased maximum clot firmness (MCF) and increased alpha angle compared with controls. Patients also had significantly higher levels of fibrinogen and PAI-1 than controls and in the former group there was a strong correlation between fibrinogen and both MCF and alpha angle. Six patients developed a VTE during the follow-up period and all had values for MCF at or above the upper limit of normal for EXTEM. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that several ROTEM parameters are significantly different in lung cancer patients compared to healthy age-matched controls, whereas only one of the parameters measured is significantly different between extensive compared to limited disease. No differences were observed between patients who developed a VTE compared to those who did not, highlighting the limitations of ROTEM use in patients with lung cancer. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available