4.5 Article

Geochemistry of the Sinian-Cambrian gas system in the Sichuan Basin, China

Journal

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 13-21

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.03.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science & Technology Special Project [2011ZX05001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the outcrops, core samples, drilling cuttings, seismic and geochemical data, natural gases of the Sinian-Cambrian gas system were derived from four sets of over-mature, high quality source rocks. The Cambrian Qiongzhusi source rock is sapropelic, with TOC of 1.94%, Ro eq. of 1.83-3.90% and a thickness of 140 m on average. The Sinian (620-541 Ma) Doushantuo source rock is sapropelic, with TOC of 1.69%, Ro eq. of 2.08-3.83% and a thickness of 11 m on average. The 3rd member of the Dengying Fm. is also sapropelic, with TOC of 1.43%, Ro eq. of 3.16-3.21% and a thickness of 13 m on average. The 2nd and 4th members of the Dengying Fm. are dominated by algal dolomite, with TOC of exhibiting 0.39%, Ro eq. of 1.97-3.46% and a thickness of 246 m on average. Most of the delta C-13(2) values are lower than -28% and gas dryness is > 99%, indicating that the natural gas is oil-derived with high maturity. The high contents of isoparaffins and cycloparaffin suggest that natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian reservoir was originated from secondary oil cracking. The Cambrian Longwangmiao gas was mainly derived from the Cambrian Qiongzhusi source rock and the gas within the Sinian Dengying Formation mainly originated from the three Sinian source rock layers. The area with gas generation intensity superimposed the four sets of source rocks exceeding 6 x 10(9) m(3)/km(2) covered 80% of the Sichuan Basin. The proved reserves exceed 1.0 x 10(12) m(3) in the Sinian-Cambrian gas system and the accumulated gas resource in the Sinian-Cambrian gas system might exceed 5 x 10(12) m(3). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available