4.6 Article

High-efficiency deep blue fluorescent emitters based on phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole substituted carbazole and their applications in organic light emitting diodes

Journal

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 2667-2676

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.07.019

Keywords

Phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole; Carbazole; Deep blue; Energy transfer; OLEDs

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB834701]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21174050, 21374038]
  3. PCSIRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of highly efficient deep blue emitters comprising of carbazole and phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole moieties are designed and synthesized. These compounds present deep blue emission, narrow FWHM, high quantum yields, high thermal and morphological stabilities. Among them, the design strategy of 2:1 ratio of phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazole and carbazole unit affords M2 with more balanced carrier injection and transporting properties. OLEDs using M2 as emitting layer is observed to deliver a truly deep blue CIE of y < 0.06 with a highest external quantum efficiency of 3.02%. By taking the full advantage of these deep blue emitters, they are further served as excellent hosts for fluorescent and phosphorescent dyes. High-performance green phosphorescent device based on M2/Ir(ppy)(3) is attained with a maximum current efficiency of 33.35 cd A(-1), a power efficiency of 22.99 lm W-1 and a maximum external quantum efficiency of 9.47%. When doped with an orange fluorescent material, upon careful tuning the doping proportion, the two-emitting-component white OLED is successfully fabricated with a maximum current efficiency of 5.53 cd A(-1) and CIE coordinates of (0.313, 0.305). Both the non-doped and doped devices exhibited high operational stability with negligible efficiency roll-off over the broad current density range. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available